Solutions
Choosing the right tube labeling technology
There is no single tube labeling solution that fits every laboratory. Different printing and marking technologies offer distinct advantages depending on sample volumes, durability requirements, automation level, and operational constraints.
This guide provides a clear, technology-driven overview of available approaches — helping users align the right instrument with their specific workflow requirements. The Sopachem team supports this process with application expertise and practical guidance.
Contact Philippe Loir your Sample Storage expert
Technology comparison
Key tube labeling technologies explained
Tube labeling solutions can be broadly grouped by printing method and automation level. Understanding these differences is essential when selecting a system that fits current needs while supporting future scalability.
Understanding your options
Tube labeling technologies for different workflows
Laser marking (direct etching)
Laser marking permanently etches information directly onto the tube surface without the use of inks or labels. This approach is well suited for applications requiring durable, consumable-free identification and consistent results in batch or automated workflows.
UV-curable ink printing
UV-curable ink printing applies high-contrast markings directly onto tubes and vials, followed by UV curing for improved durability. This technology offers a balance between flexibility and throughput across a wide range of laboratory applications.
Direct thermal / pixel printing
Thermal or pixel-based printing technologies enable direct marking of individual tubes using consumables such as ribbons. These systems are typically used for low-volume or highly variable workflows where flexibility and ease of use are priorities.
Scaling your workflow
From single-tube printing to automated batch processing
Beyond the printing technology itself, automation level plays a key role in system selection. Laboratories may start with manual or semi-automated instruments and later transition to higher-throughput or fully automated platforms.
Automation levels include:
- Single-tube systems for low-volume or highly variable workflows
- Semi-automated printers supporting medium throughput with operator interaction
- Batch and rack-based systems for consistent, repeatable processing
- Fully automated platforms integrating printing, weighing, and tracking
Selecting the right level depends on current throughput needs, staffing models, and long-term growth plans.
- Azenta Life Sciences
- Labman Automation
- TubeWriter
- Arvensis
- Azenta Life Sciences
- Labman Automation
- TubeWriter
- Arvensis
Available instruments
Tube labeling instruments across technologies
The following instruments illustrate how different technologies and automation levels address specific application requirements. Each has a defined role within tube labeling workflows.
